Key messages
Delivering eye health services in the Pacific Islands is challenging due to the remote location, susceptibility to the impacts of climate change, and economic instability. To direct future eye health research, we have reviewed all available evidence describing eye health in the Pacific Islands since 1980. The report illustrates that not enough research is available describing the prevalence of common eye conditions or service coverage in the Pacific islands, which makes it difficult to plan new eye care services.
Read the published report here.
Below is a Q&A with co-authors Dr Lisa Hamm, Dr Iris Wainiqolo, and A/Prof Jacqueline Ramke on their recently published report.
What was the question you were hoping to answer?
Our aim was to summarise all the research about eye health in the Pacific Islands since 1980. We wanted to know what research topics have been investigated, where they were conducted, and who was involved in funding. We were also interested in whether any of these variables have changed over time. Fundamentally, we hoped that this review would highlight the gaps and guide the future direction of the research.
What is the most important finding from this research?
Our review speaks to the wider issues faced by eye care providers and policy makers who are attempting to strengthen research capacity in the Pacific Islands. We observed that previous research about eye health in this region is influenced by external funders and researchers and does not correlate well with the eye conditions that are most important for people living in the Pacific Islands.
Why was it important to do this research?
Good eye health has many benefits for the well-being of individuals and society and underlies many of the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals. To support these goals, individual countries need as much information as possible describing the eye health needs of their population so that they can plan and deliver better eye care services.
Unfortunately, delivering eye health services in the Pacific Islands is challenging due to the remote location, susceptibility to the impacts of climate change, and economic instability. Without the infrastructure in place, the direction of future eye health research remains unclear. By identifying the gaps in our knowledge, we see this review as the first step towards improving eye health in the Pacific islands.
What research did you find describing eye health in the Pacific Islands?
Unfortunately, there is limited up-to-date research describing the prevalence of common eye conditions or service coverage in the Pacific islands, which makes it difficult to plan new eye care services. The lack of high-quality data (e.g. population-based prevalence studies) was notable.
The research we identified was mainly concentrated on Papua New Guinea, Fiji, and Vanuatu, although reported funding sources were most often from New Zealand, Australia, or the United States, illustrating the need to expand research infrastructure in the Pacific Islands.
What does this research say about the future of eye health in the Pacific?
Research in the Pacific Islands has evolved over the past ~40 years from small prevalence studies to larger externally funded research on specific eye conditions (that may not reflect local research priorities). Considering the economic challenges that limit financial investment into research, future research should be chosen strategically to fill the knowledge gaps identified from this report. Importantly, improving eye health in the Pacific islands will rely on first strengthening research leadership in the region so that Pacific Peoples can set their own research priorities.
Citation: Hamm LM, Wainiqolo I, Pant N, et al. Research about eye health and eye health services in Pacific Island Countries and Territories: a scoping review. The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific. 2024; 50:101152. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101152