How to look after your eyes

How to look after your eyes

Everyday activities such as reading and playing are much more fun if you can see well! For adults and kaumātua, good eyesight means you can work, drive a car, and look after your whānau. Here are some tips for looking after your eyesight.

Feel free to download our E-Y-E-S-I-G-H-T eye health poster to share with friends, whanau, or at schools.

Eye health poster - eye checks

Eye checks

Going to your school eye screening appointments or diabetes eye checks is a great way to keep your eyes healthy. Visiting an optometrist every two years is recommended.

Eye health poster - yippee

Yippee!

Spending time outdoors is great for your eyes. Don’t forget to wear your sunglasses!

Eye health poster - eat healthy

Eat healthy

Healthy food builds healthy eyes. Fruit and vegetables are great for your eyesight.

Eye health poster - smart habits

Smart habits

Smoking and vaping can damage your eyesight and it’s best to avoid these activities.

Eye health poster - issues

Issues

If you notice any changes to your eyesight, your optometrist or family doctor can offer you advice.

Eye health poster - glasses

Glasses

If you need them, wearing your glasses or contact lenses makes it much easier for you to learn at school.

Eye health poster - Hauora

Hauora

Your eyes are a picture of your health and wellbeing. Look after your body and mind.

Eye health poster - talk

Talk

Check in with your whānau to see how they are looking after their health and wellbeing. Does anyone need support to see better?

Q&A with Deepa Kumar : Master of Health Science

Q&A with Deepa Kumar : Master of Health Science

Deepa Kumar

Deepa Kumar

Master's graduate

Deepa is an Optometrist and Clinical Team Leader at Counties Manukau Ophthalmology District Health Board. In 2020, she returned to The University of Auckland to complete her Master’s in Health Science with A/Prof Jacqueline Ramke in the Community Eye Health Team.

Now a Master’s graduate, Deepa reflects on what’s involved in postgraduate study and how she has applied her research experience in public health to her clinical work.

Thesis: Non-attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening in South Auckland.

“One thing I would recommend is selecting a project topic that you’re passionate about—something that resonates with your professional interests and goals.”

Why did you decide to do a Masters?

I wanted to deepen my understanding of research and public health.  I saw it as a chance to develop research skills that could help improve patient outcomes, influence healthcare policy, and address gaps in service, especially in underserved areas like South Auckland.

Can you tell us about your Masters project topic?

My Master’s thesis focused on the non-attendance at Diabetes Eye Services in South Auckland and the impact of COVID-19. Specifically, I wanted to understand the factors that led to patients missing their scheduled eye exams for diabetic retinopathy screening and diabetic eye assessments within a tertiary ophthalmology setting over a two-year period including during the Covid 19 pandemic.

My research showed that age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status were associated with non-attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening services, and that Covid restrictions during this time presented additional barriers for diabetic patients.

I chose this topic because diabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of blindness in people with diabetes, and South Auckland has a higher proportion of people from ethnic groups at greater risk of both diabetes and related eye complications. 

What were the highlights of doing your Masters?

One of the biggest highlights of doing my Master’s was the opportunity to conduct research that could potentially make a real difference in patient attendance and hence patient care and outcomes.

Another highlight was the satisfaction of analysing data and uncovering patterns that could inform practical interventions. The process of collecting data, interpreting it, and then seeing the findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the problem was intellectually fulfilling.

I also appreciated the chance to develop stronger research, writing, statistical analysis, and critical thinking skills.

How has the experience you gained during your Masters contributed to your work?

The experience I gained during my Master’s has greatly influenced my work. The research process honed my ability to critically assess healthcare problems and solutions, which has been of great help in my clinical role at Counties Manukau. I now feel more confident in understanding and evaluating the health disparities that exist within different patient populations. This has helped me better communicate with my patients, especially in communities with high rates of diabetes, where education about eye care and screening is crucial. Additionally, the data analysis skills I developed during my research has helped in a recent clinic audit.

What advice would you give other optometrists thinking about doing a Masters?

My advice would be to approach the decision with clear goals in mind. The Master’s journey can be intense, and it’s important to have a clear understanding of what you want to achieve.

Going back to study (while working) was challenging but achievable, and ultimately very rewarding. You have to balance work and study, so it helps if you’re organized and set realistic expectations for yourself. I found that planning ahead and dedicating specific times to study made a huge difference. However, it’s also important to have support from family, colleagues, and supervisors.

One thing I would recommend is selecting a project topic that you’re passionate about—something that resonates with your professional interests and goals. Having a personal connection to your research will make the process more enjoyable and meaningful. It requires dedication and the ability to balance your professional and personal commitments.

 

“One year in”: A chat with Renata Watene about her experiences in academia

“One year in”: A chat with Renata Watene about her experiences in academia

Renata Watene

Renata Watene

Ngā Puhi | Tainui | PhD candidate

Renata Watene (Ngā Puhi, Tainui) is an Optometrist and advocate of Māori eye healthcare in Aotearoa. In 2023 she began her PhD in the Community Eye Health team, where she is exploring existing Indigenous models of eye care. Here she reflects on the challenges she has faced after her first year of doctoral studies.

Mā te kimi ka kite, Mā te kite ka mōhio, Mā te mōhio ka mārama

Seek to discover, Discover to know, Know and become enlightened

Why did you decide to do a PhD?

I would say the PhD chose me. I have been working in the optics space for more than 20 years now, and I have seen in the impacts of a privately funded health care model that creates inequities for consumers of Optometry services. In my own clinics I witnessed vast difference in services and outcomes for Māori patients. There is a large knowledge gap around Māori eyecare and use of Kaupapa Māori in Optometry in particular. With some intervention from my tupuna (grandmother) this path felt like the next step in making a meaningful impact in Optometry.

What’s the most challenging part of your studies so far?

The biggest challenge has been returning to academia from a clinical position and multiple community and governance roles. I was fortunate enough to secure a Clinical Research Fellowship through Health Research Council which contributed significantly by reducing the financial deficit that clinicians usually face if they return to do postgraduate studies.

As an alternative pathway applicant, I have had an incredible year of learning opportunities as I get up to speed with my other research colleagues. I think the feeling of imposter syndrome is very real in this space and it was comforting to learn that even those with significant research background still experience the same concerns that I do around progress of projects and validity of their research.

Working in Indigenous research adds another layer of complexity. Ensuring that the research meets the academic rigour of the Western system while being relationally accountable to our research partners and communities is at times near impossible. Working with Indigenous communities means that all processes and should be culturally appropriate and respected and that there is space for ceremony and tikanga. It is critical that I be very intentional to centre Māori and whānau voice as well, as Maori worldviews are important if we are to develop intergenerational strategies that address inequities. The western concept and indigenous concepts of time have been at odds during this process. ‘Mā te wā’ or all in good time.

What’s the most rewarding part?

The most rewarding part has been the opportunity to meet and learn from experts in equity and Indigenous eye health research. There is an obvious appetite from the local and global community toward more equitable outcomes for Māori and Indigenous Peoples, and it has been rewarding to contribute to conversations that address this. It’s a reminder of why I started this journey in the first place.

What was it like officially completing the first year of your PhD?

Giving my confirmation talk and looking back at what was completed during my first year gave me an immense sense of achievement and a clearer sense of direction for my work. But preparing for my provisional year review was challenging! Reprioritising my time and stepping back from several roles has helped me refine my focus and objectives into achievable goals for the remainder of the PhD journey. Like many processes in a PhD, you learn a lot and know how you would do things differently next time.

What are you focusing on now as you head into your second year?

Building on the strong foundation of my first year, I look forward to the next phases of my research and elevating the voices of our Māori, whānau, students, and practitioners in eyecare. I’m focusing on connecting with Indigenous Eyecare experts (and hopefully finding some more along the way!) to help inform a new eye health system that may lead to changes in how eyecare is delivered.

 

Underserved groups could be better considered in eye health surveys: everyone counts

Underserved groups could be better considered in eye health surveys: everyone counts

Key messages:

Eye health surveys generate essential information for planning new services. Some surveys specifically target underserved groups (e.g. people living in rural areas), while many exclude some groups (e.g. those without housing). In future, researchers can consider ways they can better consider underserved groups when planning their survey. 

Read the published paper and download the plain language summary of the findings.

Why do a population-based eye health survey?

Eye health surveys are used to gather information about the number of people in a population who have eye health conditions and to identify any groups of people who have unmet need for eye health services. This evidence can be used to develop more equitable eye care services.

Why did we do this research?

Our aim was to summarise the different ways that previous eye health surveys have included underserved groups. This information can be used in future eye health surveys that wish to better include these groups.

What did we do?

We identified all eye health surveys published globally since the year 2000 that estimated the number of people with impaired vision. Underserved groups were defined according to pre-determined criteria (examples included women, people living in rural areas, and unemployed people). We summarised the different ways that underserved groups were considered in the way the survey was designed, conducted, or how the results were reported.

What did we find?

Almost all surveys considered underserved groups in some way, and the number of groups considered within each survey has increased over this time. Most surveys considered groups retrospectively, such as by comparing prevalence estimates between different groups. Very few surveys prospectively considered underserved groups when designing the survey (e.g. by using recruitment strategies that enabled underserved groups to participate). Some underserved groups were actively excluded from surveys, particularly those without stable housing.

What are the implications of this research?

Some population groups with large unmet eye health needs are rendered invisible by commonly used survey methods. Small surveys of specific underserved groups are needed to supplement large national-level surveys, so that policy makers have information about the eye health needs of everyone in the population.

Citation: Goodman L, Reis T, Zhang JH, et al. Underserved groups could be better considered within population-based eye health surveys: A methodological study. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 27 June 2024. doi: 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2024.111444. Available here.

Funding: This work was not funded by a specific grant from the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Are we blinded by our measures? Refining how we assess diabetic retinopathy services worldwide

PhD candidate Nimisha Chabba presenting her work at the IAPB conference in June 2024.

PhD candidate Nimisha Chabba from the Community Eye Health team is supporting global efforts to improve eye care by refining the way that diabetic retinopathy services are monitored and reported worldwide.

Diabetes is a public health concern, as the number of people living with the disease is expected to reach 643 million by 2030. Diabetes can cause bleeding from vessels on the retina at the back of the eye (known as diabetic retinopathy), and this is the leading cause of vision loss in people of working age. Fortunately, regular eye screening and treatment can help people with diabetes to maintain good vision.

For policymakers and clinicians working to reduce vision loss from diabetes, a key priority is to gain a better understanding of access to diabetes eye care services, and how effective these services are at preserving vision. Guided by her PhD supervisors A/Prof Jacqueline Ramke and Dr Pushkar Silwal who offer their experience in eye health and health systems research, Nimisha hopes to improve the tools available to monitor diabetic eye services globally.

“We first need to understand what types of diabetic eye services are available and how many people they are reaching,” says Nimisha. “Only then can individual countries develop new and better services for people with diabetes.”

In 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) released an Eye Care Indicator Menu (ECIM)—as the name suggests, a series of measures (known as “indicators”) that individual countries can use to monitor their own eye care services in a consistent way. Included in the Menu was an indicator to monitor retinal screening coverage—that is, the proportion of people with diabetes who have accessed these services.

Importantly, the amount of data reporting this indicator is unknown, and the first stage of Nimisha’s PhD is to address this knowledge gap by summarising all the existing literature worldwide that reports diabetic retinopathy screening coverage.

Nimisha presented the preliminary findings of her research and the plan for her PhD at the IAPB’s 2030 IN SIGHT Live meeting in Mexico City in June 2024. Of note, Nimisha described significant variability in the way that services worldwide report retinal screening coverage, which means that access to diabetic retinopathy screening cannot be easily compared between settings.

“It’s important that we have the right measures available to help countries monitor whether diabetic retinopathy services are effectively reaching the people who need them,” says eye health researcher A/Prof Jacqueline Ramke.

Looking towards the next phases of her PhD research, Nimisha hopes to expand WHO’s existing diabetic retinopathy indicator by developing a way to measure and assess service access concurrently with quality (known as an “effective coverage” indicator for diabetic retinopathy). To do this, she plans to collect feedback from international experts and reach a consensus about how effective coverage should be defined, and then test out the new indicator using local data from Aotearoa New Zealand. This work will have global impact by supporting the efforts of WHO and IAPB to improve monitoring and reporting of eye care services worldwide, and Nimisha is well on the way towards achieving her goals.

“Strengthening the monitoring of diabetic retinopathy services can help reduce vision loss, and I’m excited to be a part of this,” she says.

Sources:

Chabba, N. et al. What is the coverage of retina screening services for people with diabetes? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 14, e081123 (2024). Read the published protocol here